Avast mac security 2016 remove virus7/23/2023 For example, I was affected by a PHP virus that exploited an ecommerce package on a linux server. Remember that viruses don’t necessarily have to infect the OS itself in order to be dangerous or cause serious damages to user files. No other operating systems need this rubbish. We need to be clear: they’re bad because they violated user trust and *NOT* because A/V is fundamentally bad or unnecessary. So, yes give avast very harsh criticism, they absolutely deserve it! But there’s no need to exaggerate your point to make them look bad. For example, an email/file/web server without AV can easily spread malware even if it’s isn’t technically vulnerable by itself. Sometimes the machines don’t need to be vulnerable to spread the viruses themselves, but without AV they really don’t know any better than to continue to spread the virus unchecked. I’ve seen it first hand even at companies where employees are professional programmers. But for a company/household with lots of employees/family members, then the chances of a successful attack spreading through the network is significantly increased and there have been numerous breaches that demonstrate why AV is not all snakeoil. Obviously you can improve your odds if you never download anything or open attachments, etc. Every one of us here ought to know that viruses are a non-imaginary threat. However you take it too far by suggesting AV has no use. I find this behavior despicable as well, they deserve our scrutiny, criticism, and possibly punitive damages for not being upfront with users about data collection. You don’t need anything more than what your operating system provides, whether you use Windows, Linux, macOS, Android, or iOS. Of course, with these programs running with unparalleled access to many Windows machines, we all knew antivirus companies would resort to selling user data to make an extra buck, sinking even deeper. Is anybody really surprised by this? Antivirus companies have been scammers for a long time now, spreading fear and anxiety amongst primarily less knowledgeable users, tricking and scamming them into paying exorbitant amounts of money for tools that are not needed, do not work, slow computers down, and in many cases, actively harm operating systems. Some clients paid millions of dollars for products that include a so-called “All Clicks Feed,” which can track user behavior, clicks, and movement across websites in highly precise detail. Some past, present, and potential clients include Google, Yelp, Microsoft, McKinsey, Pepsi, Sephora, Home Depot, Condé Nast, Intuit, and many others. They show that the Avast antivirus program installed on a person’s computer collects data, and that Jumpshot repackages it into various different products that are then sold to many of the largest companies in the world. The documents, from a subsidiary of the antivirus giant Avast called Jumpshot, shine new light on the secretive sale and supply chain of peoples’ internet browsing histories. Our report relies on leaked user data, contracts, and other company documents that show the sale of this data is both highly sensitive and is in many cases supposed to remain confidential between the company selling the data and the clients purchasing it. An antivirus program used by hundreds of millions of people around the world is selling highly sensitive web browsing data to many of the world’s biggest companies, a joint investigation by Motherboard and PCMag has found.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |